Vuk Velebit, Petar Ivić

What Does the State Department Report on Western Balkan Prosperity Mean for Serbia?

A new U.S. strategy is reshaping the Balkans through connectivity and partnerships.

May 2026

The report “Report to Congress on United States Policy to Promote Regional Stability and Prosperity in the Western Balkans” was published in May 2026 as a document submitted to the U.S. Congress in accordance with the provisions of the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act), which has been the subject of intense discussion in American political circles and the media in recent months. The report directly builds on the broader strategic logic of the 2026 NDAA, which increasingly views the Balkans through the prism of energy security, infrastructure connectivity, technological competition, and countering Russian and Chinese influence, rather than through the principles of nation-building and the role of a global policeman.

Key Messages

1. The Overall Tone of the Report Is Generally Positive Toward the Region and Serbia

“U.S. investment in the Western Balkans over the last several decades has produced tangible results, including robust and positive relationships with all six countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia.”

The overall tone of the report is noticeably more positive and pragmatic compared to many previous American documents on the Balkans, as the region is no longer viewed exclusively through the prism of conflict and crisis, but rather through its potential for partnership, investment, and strategic cooperation. In that context, Serbia is not singled out negatively, but is included within the broader framework of “robust and positive relationships,” which indicates that Washington today places far greater emphasis on shared interests than on old political narratives.

2. The Positions Are Fully Aligned with Trump’s Ideology

“The U.S.-led nation-building era has passed. U.S. policy in the Western Balkans is not about rescue or reconstruction, but stability and mutually beneficial partnerships.”

“The Administration is focused on empowering local actors to resolve their own challenges, rather than perpetuating an overreliance on international intervention or supervision. The United States is ready to support where our involvement is wanted and advances U.S interests.”

This is not merely a change in American policy toward the Balkans, but part of the broader global doctrine of the Trump administration. The United States no longer seeks the role of global policeman or the principle of nation-building, but rather partners capable of independently carrying the burden of their own security and regional stability. In that sense, the Balkans represent a continuation of that trend, which is positive for the region because local leaders and states are given primacy over political, security, and economic issues, with American support provided only where there is a clear shared interest.

3. A Potential Indication of Launching a Strategic Dialogue with Serbia

“The Administration plans to hold 2026 dialogues with North Macedonia and Serbia.”

This is a very important signal because a strategic dialogue would mean that Serbia is no longer “on the table,” in the sense that other actors decide its fate, but rather a state sitting at that same table as a partner in direct communication with Washington. This implies a concrete institutional mechanism through which policies in the fields of security, energy, economy, technology, infrastructure, and regional stability are regularly coordinated and aligned, which would represent one of the most significant shifts in Serbia–U.S. relations in the last several decades.

4. Strategic Connectivity as the Central Theme of the Report

“With a population of 18 million, the region sits at major transport corridors, possesses natural resources, a growing technology sector, and a skilled workforce.”

“The Administration will work to ensure U.S. firms can make substantial contributions to strategic infrastructure corridors, including the Adriatic-Ionian Corridor and Corridor VIII from the Adriatic to the Black Sea. The United States will support regional fora such as the Three Seas Initiative and work to expand bilateral agreements, building on the 2024 U.S.-Serbia intergovernmental agreement on energy infrastructure. Intergovernmental agreements enable U.S. companies to compete more effectively for strategic projects in transportation, information and communication technology, and the defense industry against adversarial and low-standard competitors.”

“The Department will engage actively to translate regional interest into commercial deals. Priority projects include the Southern Interconnection gas pipeline between Croatia and BiH; a proposed Serbia-North Macedonia gas interconnector; hydropower development in Albania, BiH, North Macedonia, and Serbia; upgrades to Kosovo’s coal power plants and coal gasification projects; and additional transmission cables tying Western Balkan grids to European markets.”

Throughout the report, the concept of strategic connectivity emerges as a central theme, ranging from transport corridors and energy to technology, infrastructure, and supply chains. The United States increasingly views the Balkans as an important geopolitical space linking the Adriatic, the Black Sea, and Central Europe, while Serbia is seen as a key regional actor due to its geographic position, infrastructure potential, and growing technology sector.

The key energy projects highlighted include the Southern Interconnection between Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, the planned Serbia–North Macedonia gas interconnector, and the further integration of Western Balkan electricity grids with the European market. In practical terms, this amounts to the creation of a new regional energy architecture aimed at reducing dependence on a single supplier, primarily Russia, and integrating the Balkans into broader European and Mediterranean energy and supply-chain flows.

5. Cooperation with American Financial Institutions Such as EXIM Bank

“To advance these goals, State will partner with the Department of Commerce, the International Development Finance Corporation, the Export-Import Bank, the Trade and Development Agency, and other agencies to identify, develop, and advance deals that benefit U.S. companies and regional economies alike.”

This demonstrates that the American strategy for the Balkans is not only political and security-oriented, but also strongly financial and investment-driven, through institutions such as EXIM Bank, the DFC, and other state agencies that support strategic projects. Serbia is already directly involved in this process, as the U.S. EXIM Bank recently approved financing for the development of a new 5G network for Telekom Srbija, representing an important shift away from Chinese technological influence and dependence on Huawei infrastructure, while strengthening ties with American technological and financial partners.

6. The Region’s Infrastructure and Energy Vulnerability as a Security Issue

“The region suffers from an infrastructure deficit. Physical transport networks lag European standards, raising costs for businesses and limiting market integration. Digital infrastructure presents a challenge with uneven high speed broadband coverage and insufficient cybersecurity capacity to protect the region’s expanding digital networks. Energy infrastructure is aging, inefficient, and sometimes overly reliant on Russian imports. The United States will pursue infrastructure investment in partnership with U.S. companies.”

“Energy dependence on Russia remains a strategic vulnerability in the region.”

The report clearly shows that Washington views the Balkans’ infrastructure underdevelopment and energy dependence as a strategic and security issue, rather than merely an economic question. Particular emphasis is placed on outdated energy infrastructure, insufficient digital connectivity, and dependence on Russian energy supplies, which is why the United States seeks, through investments, connectivity projects, and cooperation with American companies, to gradually integrate the region into Western energy, technological, and transport networks.

7. An Opportunity for Regional Investment in Energy, Technology, and Infrastructure

“The Department will engage actively to translate regional interest into commercial deals. Priority projects include the Southern Interconnection gas pipeline between Croatia and BiH; a proposed Serbia-North Macedonia gas interconnector; hydropower development in Albania, BiH, North Macedonia, and Serbia; upgrades to Kosovo’s coal power plants and coal gasification projects; and additional transmission cables tying Western Balkan grids to European markets.”

The report clearly shows that the United States views the Balkans as a space for major strategic investments in energy, digital infrastructure, 5G, transportation, and other critical sectors. Specifically identified priorities include the Croatia–Bosnia and Herzegovina gas interconnection, the planned Serbia–North Macedonia gas interconnector, the development of hydropower capacities in Serbia and the wider region, and the integration of Western Balkan electricity grids with the European market. This demonstrates Washington’s intention to limit the dominance of Russia and China in precisely these sectors while strengthening Western economic and technological presence throughout the region.

8. No Direct Pressure on Serbia Regarding the Status of Kosovo

“The United States continues to encourage Serbia and Kosovo to make progress on normalizing relations, with the goal of reaching a negotiated, durable agreement acceptable to both parties.”

The language of the report is noticeably more flexible compared to earlier periods, and there is no direct pressure on Serbia regarding the formal recognition of Kosovo*. The emphasis is placed on “an agreement acceptable to both parties,” which leaves significantly more room for diplomatic maneuvering and reflects a more pragmatic Washington approach to regional issues.

9. Security Issues Remain a Point of Disagreement, but Without Major Changes in U.S. Policy

“Kosovo and Albania are founding members of the Board of Peace and will join BiH as contributors to the International Stabilization Force for Gaza, highlighting the region’s transition from security consumer to provider.”

“The Administration continues to support the transition of the multiethnic Kosovo Security Force into a professional territorial defense force.”

These are practically the only points in the report that may be interpreted negatively from Serbia’s perspective, primarily due to support for the further development of Kosovo’s security forces and the mention of the Board of Peace initiative. However, it is important to emphasize that the Board of Peace is still not a fully developed and institutionally consolidated mechanism, while the U.S. position on the transformation of Kosovo’s security forces has existed since 2018. Therefore, there is no fundamentally new policy here, but rather continuity with already well-known American positions.

Serbia as a Natural Partner in the New American Strategy for the Balkans

In line with these developments, Serbia is increasingly positioning itself as a key regional pillar in the new American strategy for the following reasons:

  • Serbia allocates significant resources to defense and, despite its military neutrality, maintains stable and pragmatic relations with NATO, including recent joint military exercises.

  • Serbia is recognized as a key regional actor contributing to regional stability and possessing the capacity to independently conduct its own security and foreign policy, which aligns with the new American doctrine of relying on strong local partners.

  • Serbia possesses one of the most developed technology sectors in the region, with approximately five billion euros in ICT service exports, a significant portion of which is directed toward the American market.

  • Thanks to its geographic position and infrastructure potential, Serbia is emerging as a key transit and connectivity hub of the Balkans, with the potential to become one of the main actors in the new geopolitics of corridors and supply chains.

  • The report indirectly opens space for accelerating Serbia’s energy diversification, as Washington views dependence on any single energy actor as a long-term strategic vulnerability.

  • Cooperation with American financial institutions already exists in practice, and the financing of Telekom Srbija’s new 5G infrastructure by EXIM Bank represents an important step toward stronger technological integration with the United States and the gradual reduction of reliance on Chinese suppliers.